18th International Conference on “Pensions, Insurance and Savings”
Date: 9th & 10th June 2022, University Paris Dauphine Research ★ University & International University of Rabat
“14th International Conference on Pensions, Insurance and Savings”
Date: 9th & 10th May 2016, University Paris Dauphine and Berkeley University, CEDA.
Center on the Economics and Demography of Aging
“The Fifth Annual World Pensions and Investment Forum”
Date: Chimie Castle, Paris, 2nd and 3rd December 2015
“Social Security Systems in the Light of Demographic, Economic and Technological Challenges”
Location Date: Poznan, Poland 24th – 25th September 2015.
The Conference will be organized by Chair of Economic Sciences at Poznan University of Technology.
More information and on-line regisration of the conference on the website: www.kne.put.poznan.pl/mke2015
Social Security Systems and Demographical Challenges
Date: October 16th – 17th, 2014
The conference will be organized by Chair of Economic Sciences at Poznan University of Technology.
More information and on-line registration of the conference on the web site: http://kne.put.poznan.pl/mke2014/en.
How to communicate reality?: The future of pension accounting
Venue: Cass Business School, 106 Bunhill Row, London EC1Y 8TZ
Date and time: 17:30 to 20:30 on Wednesday 30 April 2008
Speaker(s): Andrew Lennard, Director of Research, ASB
Professor David Blake, Director, Pensions Institute, Cass Business School
The future of pension accounting is under review following independent reports from the Accounting Standards Board, and the Pensions Institute at Cass Business School. The evening will begin with presentations by Andrew Lennard, Director of Research, ASB, and Professor David Blake, Director of the Pensions Institute. A panel discussion and Q&A will follow looking at how these reports will impact the pension industry.
Neil Carberry, Head of Pensions and Employment, CBI
Andrew Evans, Partner, PwC
Zaki Khorasanee, Cass Business School
Fraser Low and Phil Spary, the Pensions Regulator
Michael McKersie, Assistant Director, Capital Markets, ABI
Nigel Peaple, Director of Policy, NAPF
Crispin Southgate, Institutional Investment Advisors
This event is offered in association with the Pensions Accounting Research Group (PRAG) and chaired by Jeffrey Highfield, Chairman of PRAG.
Michael McKersie, Assistant Director, Capital Markets, ABI says:
“The ASB discussion paper and consultation process provide a valuable opportunity to consider afresh whether the accounting in what is both an important and technically complex area is giving us the right answers. It looks to identify numbers that are consistent with accounting principles. Users of accounts, though, need accounting information which does justice to the nature of the underlying liabilities of pension schemes.
The paper from the Pensions Institute demonstrates, however, that the preciseness of accounting values is not consistent with the inherent uncertainty of future pension scheme cash flows. It is uncertainty about longevity and the difficulties of adequately reflecting this alongside other risk factors within the accounting data that gives unsatisfactory answers. It must, therefore, be right to seek valuation methods that better reflect the underlying shape as well as the size of these liabilities.”
First Pension Commission report discussed
Thursday, 21 October, 2004
Adair Turner, Chairman of the Pensions Commission, unpacked the commission’s first report to full house at Cass on 14 October.
The report was released earlier in the week and the event at Cass allowed Turner to go into more detail about the deeper implications of the report. He was joined on stage by Deputy Dean of Cass, Professor Steve Haberman and Pensions Institute Director, Professor David Blake. Professor Blake responded to Turner before questions were taken from the audience.
The event was also used to announce that Turner has been made a Visiting Professor of the Pensions Institute.
The report, Pensions: Challenges and Choices, presents the commission’s conclusions on the adequacy of pension provision and saving in the UK. It sets out the major challenges society faces and the unavoidable choices which need to be made.
The report was deliberately detailed and wide-ranging, examining all the different elements of the pensions system. Pension policy has too often in the past been designed piecemeal: the report argues that we need a comprehensive approach which can be sustained over the long-term.
Speaking on the day the report was released, Turner said:
“Society and individuals face a huge challenge, but one that can be overcome. Longer lives and low birth rates will change dramatically the ratio of older to younger people. Major adjustments to average retirement ages and to pension provision are required. Over nine million working people will face pensions they may consider inadequate, unless they save more or retire much later than their parents.
“The underlying problems have been getting worse for 20 years at least, but were masked by the temporary impact of the baby boom generation, by a failure to anticipate the scale of life expectancy increases and by the irrational equity market exuberance of the 1980s and 1990s.
“We must now make adjustments which we should ideally have begun 20 to 30 years ago. And to get policy right we need to look comprehensively at all aspects of the problem. Too often in the past, under successive governments, pension policy has addressed specific problems without a clear overall context. This has had unintended and adverse consequences.”
The report explains that faced with the increasing proportion of the population aged over 65, society and individuals must choose some mix of four options. Either:
- Pensioners becoming poorer relative to the rest of society; or
- Taxes/National Insurance contributions devoted to pensions rising; or
- Savings rising; or
- Average retirement ages rising;
The report argues that the option of poorer pensioners is the least attractive and that some combination of higher taxes/National Insurance contributions, higher savings and/ or later average retirement age will be required.
It also argues that no single solution makes sense, and therefore does not present a figure for a ‘savings gap’ but illustrates the trade-offs involved between different combinations of response.
Key points in the report include:
- Public expenditure constraints and an increasing number of pensioners mean that state pension provision per pensioner will decline relative to average earnings. But rather than increasing to fill the gaps, private pension saving, and in particular employer provision, is in significant long-term decline as provision shifts from final salary (“Defined Benefit”) schemes to less generous money purchase (“Defined Contribution”) schemes. (This is commonly called the ‘DB/DC’ shift).
- As a result, if current trends continued over the long-term, future pension income would be deficient in total and increasingly unequally distributed.
- And many individuals will face more risks, for example on investment returns, that they are sometimes ill-equipped to deal with.
- Home ownership could provide important retirement resources for many people, but it is not a sufficient solution to the problems and entails significant risks.
- The problems will be more severe in 15 to 25 years time than in the next 10 years. A ‘muddle-through’ option does exist but it would be less socially equitable and less economically efficient than we could achieve if we now thought through a planned and comprehensive policy for the long-term.
- There are four barriers to the success of a voluntary pensions saving system; most people do not make ‘rational’ decisions about pension saving; the cost of advice significantly reduces the return on saving; the UK pensions system is extremely complex – leading to confusion and mistrust; and means-testing increases this complexity and for some people reduces the incentives to save which the tax system provides.
This means that unless new government initiatives can make a major difference to behaviour it is unlikely that the present voluntary private system combined with the present state system will solve the problem of inadequate pension saving.
The Commission is not at this stage making recommendations on specific policy changes but the Report does call for improvements in data sources.
And it states that the way forward must involve some mix of:
- A major revitalisation of the voluntary system;
- Changes to the state system;
- Increased compulsion beyond that already implied by the State Second Pension and contracting-out arrangements;
These options will be the focus of the Pensions Commission between now and the publication of the Second Report, which will include policy recommendations, in autumn 2005.
The publication of this report kick starts the consultation process. The Commission is seeking views on the appropriate role of the Government in ensuring pension adequacy, on whether there is agreement on the facts set out, and on the best mix of the three ways forward identified.